Trump steps back from all-out trade war

For days, Donald Trump and his White House team had insisted they were fully committed to their decision to impose sweeping “reciprocal” tariffs on dozens of countries. They even derided a report on Tuesday that said the president was considering a 90-day pause – news that triggered a brief stock market surge.

But now that pause on higher tariff rates, with a few notable exceptions, is a reality. The reordering of the global economic order is on hold, and Trump’s promise of a golden age of American manufacturing will have to wait.

The White House has said that going big on tariffs and then hitting the pause button, before entering negotiations with individual countries, was the plan all along.

“We’ve had more than 75 countries contact us, and I imagine, after today, there will be more,” Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told reporters shortly after the announcement.

That framing from the White House is not surprising, of course. And it is difficult to ignore the investor panic, tumbling bond market and growing chorus of Republican criticism and public disapproval that preceded the announcement.

So was it a strategic retreat in the face of unexpected resistance, or yet another example of Trump’s “art of the deal” negotiating strategy at work?

It didn’t take long for Trump’s aides – many of the same people who said he would never back down – to fan out and celebrate the president’s move.

Trade adviser Peter Navarro said Trump’s tariff situation “unfolded exactly the way it should”.

“You clearly failed to see what President Trump is doing here,” press secretary Karoline Leavitt told a crowd of gathered reporters. “The entire world is calling the United States of America.”

They were less clear about the details of Trump’s tariff suspension, announced via a post on his Truth Social website. Did the reprieve in higher tariffs apply to the EU? Were Mexico and Canada, which had avoided the original 10 per cent baseline tariffs, somehow now included? Were tariffs targeting specific sectors affected?

Ultimately, the White House provided some clarity on these questions – but for hours US trading partners were left to scrutinise Trump’s Truth Social post and glean details from answers to questions shouted by reporters at press gaggles.

On Wednesday afternoon, Trump acknowledged that the markets had looked “pretty glum” and that “people were getting a little queasy” – a reflection that undercut some of the bravado he expressed over the past week and could hint at the real reason for his tariff change of course.

Earlier in the day, he was on Truth Social, urging people to “BE COOL!” and promising that “everything is going to work out”. And on Monday he lashed out at what he called “panicans” – a party based on “weak and stupid people” who weren’t patient with his efforts.

In the end, it was Trump who made an abrupt change of course.

He insisted, however, that his tariff announcement was one that had to be made, and that any economic disruptions reflected a sickness that had been allowed to fester in the American economy.

Democrats, meanwhile, painted a less rosy picture. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer accused Trump of “governing by chaos”.

“He is reeling, he is retreating, and that is a good thing,” he said.

In the end, the thought process behind Trump’s decision may not really matter.

The reality is that the US is now making nice – or at least nicer – with nations that had faced their retaliatory trade fire, even though Trump is still imposing a 10 per cent across the board tariff that by itself would have been huge news just a few weeks ago.

It is enough of a step down for the stock market to bounce back, however, and Trump is now leaning into a trade war with China which he hit with 125 per cent tariffs.

That will have global economic repercussions of its own, but it is more in line with recent American foreign policy – including that of Democratic President Joe Biden – as it seeks to constrain Chinese ambitions.

The big unknown, however, is whether Trump’s actions over the past week – setting allies scrambling and threatening the established global order – will have made such a strategy more difficult to pursue.

And in 90 days, when Trump’s pause expires, this week’s economic drama and uncertainty could begin all over again. (BBC News)

Jagdeo: Govt not involved in ‘Melly Mel’ detention, opposition seems anti-Trump

Vice President (VP) and General Secretary of the People’s Progressive Party (PPP), Dr Bharrat Jagdeo, has reiterated that the government had no involvement in the arrest and detention of controversial figure Melissa “Melly Mel” Atwell.
Atwell was detained last week by the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency and is scheduled to appear before Judge Francis Mwangi on March 28.
Dr Jagdeo made these remarks during his weekly press briefing at Freedom House, which was also broadcast live on Thursday.
A number of individuals, including senior opposition members, protested at the Square of the Revolution on Tuesday night in what they described as a “unity meeting” in support of Atwell. The protestors alleged that the government played a role in her detention.
“We’ve seen the protest at the Square of the Revolution, and it is the right of any Guyanese to stage a protest. We are not going to get sucked into the debate around Miss Atwell. Here are the facts: We do not control ICE in the United States of America. They seem to have a very high opinion of the People’s Progressive Party to think that we can control the US Immigration and Customs Enforcement unit… Thank you, APNU, for believing we have such powers.
“If they have a problem with the Trump administration’s policies, they should protest directly to the US government. What they are claiming, essentially, is that Miss Atwell’s human rights have been violated and that the PPP has somehow influenced the Trump administration to violate her rights… Of course, you know this is nonsense,” Dr Jagdeo stated.
He stressed that if the opposition and protestors are against Trump’s policies, they should openly declare their position instead of implicating the PPP in their criticism of the Trump administration.
Earlier this week, Attorney General Anil Nandlall also dismissed insinuations that the Guyana government played any role in Atwell’s arrest and detention.
Nandlall emphasised that the United States is a sovereign nation with the authority to enforce its laws when they are believed to have been violated.
“Those persons who are protesting must understand that they are protesting the actions of a sovereign government enforcing its laws within its own territory, as it has a legal duty to do against those whom its law enforcement agencies believe have violated the law,” he stated.
Furthermore, Nandlall suggested that Atwell’s detention may have been a consequence of her own actions, as she frequently tagged US law enforcement agencies in her Facebook posts—often using obscene or offensive language.
In a post from last November, Atwell claimed, among other things, that then-incoming US President Donald Trump could end up in jail before her.
She was responding to critics who called for her return to Guyana under Trump’s immigration enforcement policies to face criminal charges for her conduct. In that same post, Atwell used obscene language towards both President Trump and the Guyana government.
The Attorney General himself had been a target of Atwell’s attacks, as she alleged that he provided her with information about his party colleagues, as well as leaked details of Cabinet and party meetings—claims he categorically denied.
Nandlall has since filed a libel lawsuit against Atwell and noted that other individuals affected by her statements had also taken legal action.